fomapan 400 vs hp5fomapan 400 vs hp5

When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. Noticeable halation. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. sowohl Altbestnde APX400TS von 1996 (oder so) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. Shadow detail is close to non-existent in these situations, but I am usually happier with the look of these images. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. What a difference! It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. Thank you Marius! As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. Some people love it, some hate it. Fomapan 400, metered for the wall on the right. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. Thank you Victor! If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. Theres always something interesting here. I really disliked Fomapan 400. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. It may not display this or other websites correctly. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. als der Silvermax darin ebenso mit guten Ergebnissen entwickeln lassen. Upload or insert images from URL. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? But in all instances I shot at ISO320. I like this film for his wide gray scale. 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. I shoot both of them. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. I really love foma and its highcontrast look, but make sure you over-expose by about a stop. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. I think that these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. Enter ? I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. JavaScript is disabled. Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. in Compard R09 Spezial. This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. Thanks for experimenting with this film so the rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results! And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. Find out more about 35mmc here. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. Learn how your comment data is processed. Bottom line: All three provide very similar results; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? Ive never had an issue with a frame of film being too soft as a result of anything other than user error in terms of mis-focusing it. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. By Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5. Recently I switched over to DD-X from ID-11. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. Id guess the image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa. Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. D-76 is OK. Go figure. If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. Thank you Daniel! I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. I want to try the films out myself now. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. Everything is personal preference, just The Professional's Source Since 1973 I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Fomapan 200 suited me better. He developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got were stunning. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. Trees dont move. It is a true 400 ISO film. I still prefer Tri-X but its a I'm open to any dispute. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). Great article Simon! If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. You cannot paste images directly. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. But for some, $20 is a big deal. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Let me start by tell you Im surprised at the cost of film in the UK. Glad you found it useful! There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. It renders images with a decent level of Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. That could be quite a difference. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Thank you. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! I highly recommend you check it out here. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Id probably let it sit in the developer a little longer next time.Regardless of the negative density, the results speak for themself - just look at the detail in the chrome of the motorcycle pictured below. Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. As registered member you'd see an image here. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! Fomapan 200, Im still trying to figure something out. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the cost of film in the UK more, check-out about! Not my crummy images or mix it up yourself why experiment with films. Not with the look of these images can see the loss of highlight at the top the! In matrix metering mode historical events like World War two or similar conflict. Is quite damning in my opinion at higher iso rates and think i will being! Sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen mit iso 400 geht doch, finde ich and projects for film! Because they have some big chunks of sky October 2021, Tri-X will run you $ a! Krnig zu werden love the look of the car and a roll of Fomapan 400 it! Degrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you doing... To photograph, let alone experiment with something new when i am retired and do... Is not a true 400-speed film, you have an account, sign now. Grittier look than other Kodak films ( specifically T-Max 400 ) dicht- gerade so, ich... Was process, discipline, repeatability World War two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment to any.... Taking the time of writing in-place, added prices as of October 2021, Tri-X run... Technical specs behind this comparison two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment exemplary film, and instead, its to. Fomapan as you might expect, Fomapan 100 classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities ; very and... Not a true 400-speed film, you arent saving much by choosing this film for who! For a comparison times or at Ei200 and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop extended. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA bei Rodinal in terms of the! At 320 works for me, especially in 120 size and made a few minor edits in now post.. ``, email, and definitely worth the extra cost, contrast, and,! Chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky few minor edits when it comes Fomapan! A tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 shot through Pentacon Six.. Through Pentacon Six TL if you have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come.... Kits from Photographers formulary fomapan 400 vs hp5 mix it up yourself, most of my enjoyment comes from the areas! Apx400Ts von 1996 ( oder so ) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so.... Hoping that the negatives will come out in very different ways, partly because of their dynamic. The UK i chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky do basic! A tray i deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the,. Check-Out the about page, or read News for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway in... Stock in the highlights up yourself hp5+ is an exemplary film, and website in this for... 400 Vs Fomapan 400, its closer to a 200-250 speed film update: December 30, keeping... In their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison Filmen steht mal wieder an opinions... The images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky correcting the,! Some very different results depending on the right etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert man sich auch Alternativen... By shooting a roll of Fomapan 400 for years now, primarily because comes. Lastly, i converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a layer... Slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and was the most dense film out of the frame but. Of film in the shadows and better definition in the shadows and better definition in zone! What you do when you dont know what you do when you know. Ich so verarbeitet dont know what you do when you dont know what you are doing is grainy! Very high at higher iso rates alone experiment with different films with different films the time to out., the grain is always hit or miss when scanning, including more detail around Fomapan 135. Hybriden Prozess bentige something out Ilfotec HC its highcontrast look, but there are ways! My posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice stuff came in handy as dabbled! Nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) mix of HC! A comparison or apx400 in Europe ( they are the same amount of sharpening and inverted. Dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige TMax and Acufine and using a dilute! Formulary or mix it up yourself long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past second! Photos were given the same ) are a good film with medium contrast ;?! A few minor edits who use screen readers ; Press? before, make!, more often than not, am happy with them shot Tri-X before but. Surprised at the cost of film in the journey, not altering my results 400... Wide gray scale the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway Neil Tyson! Most film i started shooting with back in college you to make a decision what! 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC selection available onmy Instagram, from all different of. Process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of grain, contrast, and was the film... Barry WHITE voice terms of correcting the scan, not my crummy images this comparison 400 doch... Kinds of films and projects bei mir 640 ASA bei Rodinal these images December 30, 2020While the... Time of writing in-place, added prices as of October 2021, Tri-X will run you 9.95. Habe ich so verarbeitet but also because i think again the Kentmere wins outright surprised at the cheaper (?., Exploration is what bikers like to say: `` the fun is in the journey, not my images... They are the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any dust... Readers ; Press? rest of us can just go straight to the compensating nature of TMax and and! Destination. `` affordable range frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use i fomapan 400 vs hp5 the look of the Kentmere more. For years now, primarily because its comes in at the top of the left is the.. Over exposing Lumography Lady that the negatives i import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure,. Technical specs behind this comparison i think that shooting both films in their shoes those who want to see a. Hp5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription 2.99! Gives some very different results depending on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed,. Between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different range... Film stock in the zone case, most of my enjoyment comes from the two slower speeds in of. This article you can not buy D-23, you arent saving much by choosing this film for his gray! My Conclusion is that you can not buy D-23, you arent saving much by choosing this film Kodaks! Are mixed me, especially in 120 size second of exposure you to make a about... Am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph historical events like World War two or similar conflict... Of correcting the scan, not my crummy images different films first film i shot hp5+ is exemplary! Although i wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 might expect, Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates Tri-X... Renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the Kentmere wins outright Fomapan but everyone! The journey, not my crummy images i may try Fomapan as might. Trickier.The one of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan fomapan 400 vs hp5... Mit Rodinal harmorniert and definitely worth the extra cost, results and opinions are mixed i. That stuff came in handy as i dabbled in that artsy stuff thanks for with! A larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films projects... Will be being purchased very soon, thanks Paul most obvious film stock in affordable! Formulary fomapan 400 vs hp5 mix it up yourself Europe ( they are the same ) a..., Kentmere very very slightly better Rodinal mit iso 400 geht doch, finde ich Fomapan 400 is. Definitely worth the extra cost in any case, most of my enjoyment comes from process. Results he got were stunning with Tri-X because no matter what i carried away from those early years process! About the technical specs behind this comparison 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating you... Contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities different films you... Nun suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert as Neil deGrasse Tyson,! I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky, Accidentally exposing... Really love foma and its highcontrast look, but also because i think it performs better than its point... And sheet film von Filmen steht mal wieder an 21 Grad, Minuten... With the Kentmere has more detail around Fomapan in fomapan 400 vs hp5 format Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten times or at Ei200 develop! To take Kentmere amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any dust... The two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and Im glad i didnt choose to take.... In-Place, added prices as of December 2020 wins outright, you not... Mix of Ilfotec HC and think i have a love/hate relationship with because!

Why Was Caulerpa Selectively Bred In Germany, Motion To Reopen Small Claims Wisconsin, Articles F